Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhoka The mystery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:18, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dhoka The mystery[edit]

Dhoka The mystery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a directory of student projects. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was about to nominate this for deletion myself. Either way, despite its claim to notability as the first animated student film produced in the Maldives, I couldn't actually find reliable coverage that confirmed this. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - lack of WP:RS. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If a "student project" met our inclusion criteria, it would be welcome... but this particular one currently lacks coverage in reliable sources, and in lacking such can be seen as failing WP:NF and simply being TOO SOON. Allow it back if standards are ever met. Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nomination and as MichaelQSchmidt suggested about TOO SOON and WP:NF, the article can be created later once the project get completed and able to draw a significant coverage in reliable sources. — CutestPenguinHangout 15:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's hardly much here and no signs of better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.