Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanehi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanehi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability standards. The 2011 census handbook for the district doesn't list a Dhanehi anywhere, although it does list the Mawai mentioned in the article as a separate village. I can find it on the map, but the map in the census handbook (p. 365) seems to indicate that this spot falls within the village of Mawai, or possibly the neighboring village of Sareni instead. I assume that Dhanehi is merely a hamlet within one of those two villages, and thus has no official recognition that WP:GEO requires. A cursory web search also turns up nothing except a "Sarai Dhanehi" in Faizabad district, and the usual auto-generated "Weather in X" pages, which doesn't indicate that it meets WP:GNG either. 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 04:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- DaxServer (talk) 11:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, unless someone can show that this place has a legal recognition. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, having searched the official and unofficial websites for the 2011 Census of India, there's no village in Rae Bareli district with even a similar-sounding name to this one. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.