Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexecure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dexecure[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of evidence for notability according to WP:NCORP--the refsare notices of funding of self-serving interviews. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:19, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - yet another instance of spam about an unremarkable startup. I wouldn't be surprised if this was WP:UPE, and I've blocked the creator for advertising. MER-C 12:13, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and as stated by MER-C, seem to be a case of WP:COI Kakaey (talk) 06:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.