Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devrukhe Brahmins - List of Surnames and Gotras
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Devrukhe Brahmins - List of Surnames and Gotras[edit]
- Devrukhe Brahmins - List of Surnames and Gotras (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An unsourced list of surnames allegedly related to the topic of Devrukhe Brahmins with no context or evidence of why these names might be notable. StarM 03:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 03:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak
keepdeletefor now as a fork for length/organization of Devrukheper below and more extensive searches at the mentioned AfD and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devrukhe Brahmins - List of Institutions founded by Devrukhes, but the several articles listed at the top of Devrukhe all need a closer look and reorganization. JJL (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devrukhe Brahmins - Original 98 Villages, same author, similar topic. Just closed as delete for verifiability issues. StarM 02:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apart from the verifiability issues already highlighted, this also seems to be a case of listcruft, specifically items 1, 2, 4, 7 and 8. Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 16:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Verifiavility and notability lacking. Also, per above comments. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 18:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete surnames who are a particular caste/religion? Nope. List of Roman Catholic surnames would never fly either. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.