Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devonté

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Devonté[edit]

Devonté (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only references are the subject's own social media websites and itunes. Nothing to corroborate any notability. Justeditingtoday (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)A general web search reveals noth[reply]
  • Delete - I cannot find any real mention of (this) Devonté on any news database using various combinations of search terms. When examined closely, I don't believe he meets any of the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, and there is certainly not any kind of reliable secondary source to support this. There were not really any other sources out there to support meeting WP:GNG either... --Jack Frost (talk) 10:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I cannot find information about him either. Dean Esmay (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - social media posts seem to be the main sources here. There's not enough to suggest that external parties are writing about him or that he is presently a musician of note outside of his immediate fanbase. Clawsyclaw (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.