Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deverry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:12, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deverry[edit]

Deverry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about kingdom in a series of novels. Completely in-universe style, non-notable on its own. Mikeblas (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There's just nothing out there to show that the kingdom has received coverage independent of the series. The style/tone is more fit for a fan wiki and given that there's already a fine entry at this page, there's nothing to transwiki either. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:28, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The title would serve as a good redirect to the main article, but I don't think that this fictional country will ever really reach the level of notability needed for an article and there's already a really, really well-written Wikia entry on this (likely where the WP article got copied from), so no need for the history. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.