Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Developer conscience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Developer conscience[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This WP:NEO was coined six days ago in a blog. Otherwise only 43 google hits. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The long-standing consensus at English Wikipedia is that new phrases are almost never notable. I see no evidence that this has taken popular culture by storm. Bearian (talk) 20:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC) P.S. Nothing in the news], either. Bearian (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologisms aren't normally notable, and this seems to be quite the normal neologism. Nyttend (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - pretty much falls under WP:MADEUP. No evidence of notability. Robofish (talk) 01:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not for stuff made up one day. Steven Walling 05:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.