Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deva Mahal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 08:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deva Mahal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician, whose only stated or sourced indication of notability is that her debut album came out eight days ago. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article the moment it's possible to provide cursory verification that she exists: she has to pass an NMUSIC criterion for an article to become earned, but nothing stated or sourced here does so yet. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she has a stronger notability claim and more sourcing for it, but as of right now it's still WP:TOOSOON. Bearcat (talk) 22:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hannahmegmarx (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)*Keep per WP:GNG based on a Google News search with a pages of international news sources - not just related to her 2018 debut album. Hmlarson (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And supporting what notability criterion in NMUSIC? I see lots of glancing namechecks of her existence, but (a) not enough sources that are substantively enough about her to count toward passing NMUSIC #1, and (b) zero sources that verify anything about her that would get her over any of NMUSIC #2 through #12. Bearcat (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - notability is not inherited from one's parents. Maybe too soon.--Rpclod (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG additional Google News results with international news sources and additional references added to page as artist in own right, beyond relationship with father.Hannahmegmarx (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis that artist has received coverage in The New York Times, The Guardian, PopMatters, Elmore Magazine, Parade, Exclaim!, and Relix. Artist has also performed internationally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marisnyhart (talk • contribs) 22:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep easily passes the General Notability Guideline with articles such as this one from The Guardian. Trout slap for nom. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:17, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.