Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dev Mohan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:40, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dev Mohan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Probably meet WP:TOOSOON, fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG DMySon 04:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:02, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant media coverage and was previously a model. Number of films does not indicate notability when the person has media coverage.[1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by TamilMirchi (talk • contribs) 00:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Apart from his interviews, there are substantial new coverage about the actor with his name as heading. However, this is his debt film. I think it can be kept, if substantial media coverage can be a criterion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashique2020 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above two resources are the interviews of the subject that cover his film publicity. Still lack of secondary resources that are independent of the subject. The one film is not enough to justify subject's notability. Again fails WP:NACTOR. DMySon 05:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete- I complete agree with nominator, he clearly fails WP:NACTOR. 27.100.13.132 (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review this also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dev_Mohan . 27.100.13.132 (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:NBIO, and WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 09:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet acting notability because that requires multiple significant roles, and only one is listed. Does not meet general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not meeting WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG currently. May be notable in future. Hitro talk 06:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails NACTOR and GNG Spiderone 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Robert McClenon - the sources don't establish notability per GNG, and there is only one role there which doesn't establish notability per NACTOR. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.