Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny of Souls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Synergy 01:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Destiny of Souls[edit]
- Destiny of Souls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BK. See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journey of Souls. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NB because of a lack of third-party reviews. No mentions on a Google Book search aside from the books themselves. DARTH PANDAduel 21:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Neutral. No opinion following addition of sources. Thanks for the hard work! DARTH PANDAduel 01:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I added a Publishers Weekly review to the article and this book is mentioned/is a reference in several other books [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above or, failing that, merge and redirect to Michael Newton. I would like to see more references in the article. It seems this is possible. It is included in 50 Spiritual Classics. His books have apparently been translated into over 25 languages.[8], and this one is stated to have been "awarded 'Metaphysical Book of the Year' in 2001 by the Independent Publishers Association."[9] It is likely that someone will input the book title as a search term. Ty 03:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Captain-tucker. More references/reviews are available but requires some more research= more time to include. AlexGWU (talk) 23:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.