Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny Watford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 00:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Destiny Watford[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Engaging in one sucessful environmental project is not notability DGG ( talk ) 20:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:44, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Weak keep, I'm more minded to deletion with the article in it's current state. But winning a major environmental award makes her notable. W C M_email 08:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Clear keep the Goldman prize is a clearly internationally important and reputable award, its the "nobel" of environmental action, Sadads (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have started revising the article and adding more sources to further support WP:BASIC/WP:GNG/not WP:BLP1E notability (she was not low-profile before or after; the success was significant and her role is well-documented), and WP:ANYBIO notability seems clear, e.g. the Goldman Environmental Prize is described by The Weather Channel as "the "Nobel Prize for the environment," which is awarded to only six individuals representing each of the world's continents." Beccaynr (talk) 18:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After Beccaynr's improvements, the article looks perfectly fine to me - the notability guidelines are met - there's enough of IRS covering the subject in depth. Less Unless (talk) 11:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added additional information to denote ongoing activity and accolades. Crystalontheweb (talk) 20.35, 01 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep amended article meets notability guidelines Kaybeesquared (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.