Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 01:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Destiel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A meme with no reliable sources; the closest thing is "knowyourmeme.com". Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 16:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. Delete, possible speedy deletion candidate. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources, fails WP:GNG, and as mentioned, WP is not Urban Dictionary. Possible speedy under WP:CSD#A7. Jguy _Talk^Done 17:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Borderline for speedy on grounds of 'context', maybe? Peridon (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced, unofficial fancruft with no evidence of any notability. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entirely non notable fan craft. Possibly a candidate for A7 as non notable web content. Safiel (talk) 02:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.