Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Despina Pavlou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Despina Pavlou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An adequately-sourced and seemingly accurate article, although clearly and inevitably negative. Per WP:BLP1E, should it be here? Does it pass WP:BLPN? Is this what we're here to do?

Also see recent removals at Lord Grey School. Merge to that article would be a possibility.

Neutral for myself, but I think this warrants a wider audience. Mostly I want to avoid any more quiet deletions by passing one-edit IP editors and the inevitable edit-warring. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:40, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete What I'm seeing is all news coverage, connected to a few events a decade to seven years ago. After that, the GHits cease, so I see no lasting notoriety. Mangoe (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete this is the case of a head teacher getting in legal trouble for alleged criminal actions. Nothing of note here. This is just a passing news event, not at all encyclopedic in nature. One way to judge this is to ask "if this event had occured in 1917, would we have any chance of finding any source mentioning it?" The answer is no, so it is a non-notable event, so it does not make the person notable, so we delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.