Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desperation (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 20:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Desperation (album)[edit]

Desperation (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · (album) Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish that this meets WP:NALBUMS or WP:GNG. Might be worth a redirect to band's article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boleyn (talkcontribs) 08:19, 13 February 2014‎


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: Until now, this AfD was improperly formatted (lacking all of the header code). Should be considered as "starting" now for administrative purposes. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  04:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Relisting comment: According to The Bushranger, this nomination wasn't properly formatted until he fixed it and relisted it. Therefore, this should be considered the second and final customary relist for low-participation discussions. Mz7 (talk) 02:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.