Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeskRoll

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DeskRoll[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website/software has no independent sources. I've looked for more, and I can't find anything but press releases and indiscriminate software directories. Given the lack of sources, it does not meet the general notability guidleine or the guideline on software. I initially proposed a speedy delete of this as nonnotable web content, but this is in that grey area of cloud services that both are and are not web content, so here we are. MrOllie (talk) 15:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete—I have no qualms calling this web content... A7. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 21:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Speedy deletion was previously contended on the basis that the product is technically innovative, but in the absence of reliable 3rd party evidence of the product and any innovation (I am only finding PR type coverage) it fails WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 06:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hi. I can't see how it is possible to establish its notability. I can't seem to find three independent reviews for it. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 15:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hi Everyone. I am a software developer and I can check its innovations by reading its open code. You can register on DeskRoll and try to connect to the Demo Computer (you do not need to install anything, it works in browsers). As we can see from the session page https://lime.deskroll.com/en.12477/21185098065220d88a2c2e4/ (line 2086) it uses WebRTC. Moreover, it tries to fix the beta state of WebRTC by emulation a stream protocol. I understand that it is my mistake that the wiki article is unfinished, but as far as I know now three articles about this product are being prepared. The first one is going to be on this blog http://bloggeek.me/webrtc-interviews/. So please, give me a couple of weeks and I will add independent sources into the article. Thanks, Eugen (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC) — EHartmann (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Please, consider my contributons to ru.wikipedia - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F:%D0%92%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4/EHartmann Russian is my native language. I made my first contribution to wikipedia at the beginning of 2012. I have very specific interests - genetic genealogy and remote desktop software. My account is not for spam.[reply]
Delete Thanks to EHartmann for the good work, but this particular topic is WP:TOOSOON. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.