Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desiree Parker
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Desiree Parker[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Desiree Parker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources do not include a single independent, reliable source. 5 references to desireeparkerofficial.com are obviously not independent. Facebook is not an acceptable source, nor is medium.com. The buzzfeed entry is written by a Community Contributor. dailymotion.com is her demoreel. deviantart.com is not an editorial, but user-submitted content. thehearup is not so clear cut. The article is written by Saad Mushtaq who "follows the money and covers all aspects of emerging tech here at The Hear Up". Hmm... Anyway, the article is an interview, so it's not a secondary source. Then there's bloglovin.com, written by Jeffery Thompson, whose article How To Be A Triple Threat Like Desiree Parker has the same title as the one written by shahmir55 for deviantart.com that is also called How To Be A Triple Threat Like Desiree Parker. Coincidence? No. The text is nearly the same. Delete as spam please. Vexations (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - clear WP:GNG failure Spiderone 20:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 20:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: (edit conflict) Definitely fails WP:GNG, probably a borderline WP:G11 anyway. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.