Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Win

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete no references or improvements ever appeared, despite promises. If rewritten should cite some kind of source. W.marsh 16:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Design Win[edit]

Not notable, at least given the lack of context. Cordless Larry 22:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto Design Chain. Cordless Larry 22:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously one cannot expect the pages to be completed within a matter of minutes, but that they should be refined over time. To say there is a lack of context only says that the pages are not complete. I can see moving the Design Win page into the Design Chain page, but to completely delete them is ridiculous indeed; it says that the method doesn't exist. However, it is readily apparent by the fact that there is an entire magazine devoted to the subject of Design Chaining that this subject is of importance to the business world. As a matter of information I am not in any way associated with Cadance nor their magazine, but am a technologist in the industry whom specializes in design chaining. As is readily seen by the edits of the pages I have edited out any additions that would benefit the company for which I work and will continue to do so until it is deemed ethical by wikipedia. Anomalycp 23:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I'm willing to accept that this might survive the nomination - it's just that to me, it didn't seem notable. After some more Google searching, I think you may have a point, although I think that the two articles should be merged. I'd like some other opinions though. Cordless Larry 23:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The two articles can be merged. Anomalycp 00:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge. If Design win stays its own article, the reference must be improved (because as it is, no explanation of concept can be found). arj 19:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.