Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Iversen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derek Iversen[edit]
- Derek Iversen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recently created BLP, poorly referenced, does not establish notability, created by a mostly vandalism account, prod was contested. 117Avenue (talk) 18:34, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could not find any sources to satisfy WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 07:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Some coverage, perhaps substantial, in a paywalled LA Times article, but one in-depth artice (if it is) does not WP:BASIC/WP:GNG make. Two, maybe; one, no. --joe deckertalk to me 23:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.