Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Der Golem (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Der Golem (magazine)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I simply found noting to suggest much needed improvement with my best search result this and we usually think of magazines and other publications as notable or at least known but I doubt anyone would care or miss this article (it only publishes twice a year suggesting few to almost none attention) as it has been untouched with never anything close to change since starting (by a German IP, with only two edits and this one included as one of them) in November 2004. At best, this would be best mentioned elsewhere such as a list. SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The article is not backed up by reliable secondary sources, nor am I able to locate any. The only reason I qualify my !vote with "weak" is that I don't read German, so it is possible that something is out there that I am unable to uncover. - Location (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A search with a preference for German web content didn't find any secondary sources. On the publishers web site is a statement that the magazine has been ceased with a last edition in 2006. --— Ben Ben ^(talk) 12:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.