Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deo (comic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deo (comic)[edit]

A webcomic found on the free webcomic webhost Comic Genesis, here. Alexa makes no mention of it in Comic Genesis' stats. A Google search for "deo webcomic" (without quotes) brings back 170 links. But when you look at them, the majority is nothing to do with the webcomic. Is there anything notable about this website? Are there any good sources about this website? - Hahnchen 23:55, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete per Hahnchen Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 01:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. Nifboy 01:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Delete as nn webcomic. --Ter e nc e Ong 04:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no signs of notability. -- Dragonfiend 05:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn --Khoikhoi 08:00, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 16:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn cruft article. -Oscar Arias 16:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Deo is one of the better-written webcomics, IMO, and deserves better notice. I encourage people to read it before voting to delete just because they never heard of it. Plus, the article has more material than a lot of stubby kept webcomic articles. Coyoty 17:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn cruft. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 21:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn. The art is incredibly well-drawn, but the comic is still, at this time, not notable. -- Zaron 20:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed; guy has talent Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 22:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.