Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denyse Tontz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Denyse Tontz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I find the usual listing showing that she exists and has had the roles stated. However, I have not been able to find coverage beyond this, except on her personal site. Prior AfD determined (somehow...) that she meets WP:ENTERTAINER. However, I do not find two significant roles (see article talk page), which would only establish the presumption of notability. Actual notability demands independent reliable sources we simply do not have at this time. Too soon. SummerPhD (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - without prejudice if subject becomes notable. I looked at the previous Afd discussion, but disagree with the outcome. Looking at her IMDB entry[1] I don't see significant roles in multiple notable movies or TV shows; her biggest claim to fame is a recurring role on Big Time Rush; secondary roles in mostly TV movies; her latest TV movie role is as "Snotty Girl". Google search does not result in significant independent sources.Seaphoto ^Talk 07:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above reasonings. Keb25 (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.