Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denver Randleman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Denver Randleman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Denver Randleman was one of the NCOs in E Company, 506th Infantry Regiment (United States) during World War II; neither his rank (staff sergeant) or his highest award (bronze star) qualify him for notability under WP:SOLDIER. Post-war, he went on with his life, becoming successful in business but garnering no significant coverage. The character "Bull Randleman" had a point of view segment in the fourth episode of the miniseries. Randleman is listed in several Ambrose books as having provided an oral history to the Eisenhower Center and is mentioned in passing in a Brotherton book. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 13:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 13:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable for stand alone article; redirect name to BOB article. Kierzek (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:SOLDIER & significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.