Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentistry and the environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation as an appropriate redirect. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dentistry and the environment[edit]
- Dentistry and the environment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
POV, OR, and most of it is more related to industry in general than to dentistry Yaksar (let's chat) 23:52, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Many of these "xxxx and the environment" articles have created a lot of unnecessary confusion and duplication, and I'm pleased that some have already been deleted. Johnfos (talk) 01:52, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An interesting thesis, but not established as a viable topic. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to dentistry#environmental impact per wp:retain useful sources. The dentistry article would need more about quick silver. walk victor falk talk 07:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: we already have Amalgam (dentistry), and I do not see where the article under discussion calls out mercury among the byproducts. - 2/0 (cont.) 17:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. & others. Heavy on OR and notabality not established.--JayJasper (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.