Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennison Bollay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dennison Bollay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. When I try to find sources on this individual, the 234 Google matches all seem to be Wikipedia mirrors or passing references. How this ever survived the first nom for deletion is beyond me. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 06:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Someone tried to speedy it is an autobiography in 2005, but apparently we couldn't speedy unsourced autobiographies that didn't reliably assert their significance back then, and it was sent to VfD. The result was keep, but I would tend to disagree; I can't find any non-wikipedia source that says he did any of this stuff. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and I'm in agreement with the above. Third-party content is severely lacking and we have a victim of self-referencing. The debate for the prior VfD was essentially non-existent and would not stand as consensus by today's standards. BLP care is much better now than 5 years ago. ♪ daTheisen (talk) 07:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of WP:RS. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.