Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis L. Kappen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is clear. BD2412 T 22:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis L. Kappen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even if this person is notable, which I doubt, WP:TNT applies. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA, possible an autobiography. Edwardx (talk) 00:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 00:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even a remote pass of WP:Prof or GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. I can only echo the nom. Though I'll go further and say there's no way this isn't an autobio - Dekappitation is the kind of username joke that's only going to occur to you to make if your name is D. Kappen. -- asilvering (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be a vanity page. He seems to work at Humber, but nothing to suggest he is notable. A long list of "look what I published". Oaktree b (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We lack adequate sourcing to show notability. Plus this appears to have been created by the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.