Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Stillman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 03:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Stillman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article derived from a website bio with OTRS permission, unfortunately doesn't imply any notability. Step hen 23:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - looks like there could possibly be some notability, unfortunately the source is biased, and the article is written like an advertisement. --Ashershow1_{talk•contribs} 00:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The subject's career is simply describe in this article. She probably is quite competent in her job, but there is nothing to suggest she is notable. It appears to have been created as form of personal advertising.Rotmo (talk) 04:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: This is a pretty blatant G11 case, especially given that there's nothing in the article that suggests the subject would pass the GNG, WP:BIO or any other notability criteria on her own merits. OTRS can certainly suspend the provisions of WP:COPYVIO, but it can't grant a free pass from the CSD criteria. Ravenswing 18:07, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing special about this person; the company she works for doesn't even have an article! PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 03:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.