Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise Stapley (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Survivor: Philippines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Denise Stapley[edit]

Denise Stapley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable for winning Survivor: Philippines. Her finishing sixth in Survivor: Winners at War may not be notable after all, despite using a Hidden Immunity Idol to nullify votes against her and to get Sandra Diaz-Twine eliminated. I'm unsure whether her onscreen relationships are worth writing about her.

Furthermore, her work as a "sex therapist" or psychologist or any other may not be notable after all. In other words, not notable as such, despite continuing media coverage (or some of that).

How about WP:PAGEDECIDE if neither WP:BLP1E nor WP:BIO1E applies? Also, should be redirected to Survivor: Philippines or list of Survivor (American TV series) contestants. George Ho (talk) 01:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot to say this: her notability outside Survivor not yet confirmed by reliable sources. George Ho (talk) 01:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • REDIRECT to Survivor: Philippines. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:51, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • REDIRECT and MERGE with Survivor: Philippines. The nominator already hit all of the major points: dubiously sufficient independent, significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources to justify an independent article under GNG, and what does exist suggests that a PAGEDECIDE analysis made in light of WP:BLP1E nor WP:BIO1E should lean towards merging this back into the parent article about the show. Notably, this article was created with the edit summary "as per precedent with past winners of survivor", which is not the basis upon which he judge notability or the need for independent articles, needless to say. That was more than twelve years ago, and if the current state of the sourcing is as good as it could get in all that time, I think this is a straight forward call. SnowRise let's rap 00:32, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.