Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Den'Z

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Den'Z[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, it seems. Can't find RS covering it (online at least). Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Lack of easy-to-find sources isn't a big surprise as any existing sources would likely be in Japanese and published about 20 years ago when the company was most active. That said, they didn't last long and never released anything especially notable and probably don't pass WP:CORP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:34, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In light of the period of activity being then, the firm is not notable and appears that it would not pass the notability test. --Qwerty Binary (talk) 04:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.