Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demon Eyes Kyo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Samurai Deeper Kyo characters. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Demon Eyes Kyo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Samurai Deeper Kyo through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. The sources from the previous AfD were never shown to actually have actual substantial coverage of the character, and nothing of substance has been added. TTN (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of Samurai Deeper Kyo characters. The previous AfD seems to have confused popularity with notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Samurai Deeper Kyo characters, seeing that nothing is referenced to reliable sources in the article one can easily just add to the content already on the character page without a merge. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.