Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic rebulic of the congo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 02:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic rebulic of the congo[edit]

Article exists already, of course. And there is no need to merge anything, no info here is revelant to the country or is already found in the legitimate article (along with much more). εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 16:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not even worth redirecting to the Democratic Republic of the Congo article. Delete. Tonywalton | Talk 16:54, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't suggest a redirect, because most people don't search countries with lowercase letters. lol. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 16:56, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Umm, in case nobody noticed, it is even mispelled! --StuffOfInterest 17:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, that's why it's not even worth a redirect. Tonywalton | Talk 20:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per stuffofinterest. Youngamerican 17:33, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ahasuerus 20:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. 23skidoo 21:41, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. rodii 22:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as mis-spelling. Rebulic. Dammit, I guess they were drunk or something lol. Zordrac 23:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.