Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy of information

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Democracy of information[edit]

Almost entirely original search; user's own opinion, kinda soapbox-y too. Very much a user's essay, not in any way suited to WP. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 02:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research. Obvious essay.--Dacium (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Essay. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ditto. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete before I write an article on Thor, and why he stinks: Personal essay, and WP not a free web host. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not an encyclopedia article. Prewitt81 (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously. "If I have information to share I can post it on Wikipedia.org". Yeah, but if it's gonna be like this, it won't stick around on here for long. I suggest a WP:SNOW closure because there's no point in debating this further.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually read the whole essay and it seems to me that the creator of this page fails to understand what Wikipedia is not.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.