Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy in Iraq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone wants it userfied just post a request on my talk page. kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Democracy in Iraq[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is basically an essay. Politics of Iraq is a sufficient place to discuss Iraqi political history. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 21:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, an article on the history of democracy in what is now Iraq would probably be a neat thing to have, but this is an opinion essay and not an encyclopædia article. To write that article, we'd need to basically start over. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete this needs to be started over. Secret ^account 05:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Already have articles with Politics of Iraq and History of Iraq that cover topic. Really not sure if it makes sense to have "Democracy in Asia" template also (perhaps best left to simple government page which would provide more context). mikeman67 (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy for now. I have no problems with the concept of this article, but it needs a lot more editing work to clarify its scope and for inline citations. On the other hand, it is not so awful as to be destroyed. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : Notable, great scope. But it should be re-written. OccultZone (Talk) 10:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.