Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Demo 2002, no need for a disambiguation with a single target, and not a single keep vote neither. No consensus (kept by default) for Demo 2002 (Orcustus album). So I, as editor, boldly removed that section from Orcustus - Nabla (talk) 02:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Demo 2002[edit]

Going for the 3rd round now: There are many bands that have released demo albums in 2002; but none has turned up yet that passes WP:MUSIC. The album by Orcustus, co-nominated below, is self-released, first in 1.000 copies, then (again self-released) on the Internet; and none of the sources quoted discusses this album in detail. Therefore, both the album page and the now obsolete disambig page should be removed. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listing also:

Demo 2002 (Orcustus album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

--B. Wolterding (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some more references to the Demo 2002 (Orcustus album) article, including reviews and an interview. I hope this will be enough so that the article is not deleted. Bulgakoff (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Demo 2002, but Keep Demo 2002 (Orcustus album). Out of those 10 or so references, there are a couple that pass WP:RS and so pass WP:MUSIC#Albums. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 19:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. Not notable and dab page unnecesaary. Insufficient significant coverage in reliable sources to keep the Orcustus demo - can be adequately covered in the band's article.--Michig (talk) 07:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Demo 2002 (Orcustus album). I have added 6 more references to the article (reference 5 through 11 in the article). Bulgakoff (talk) 11:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The number of links seems impressive, but the quality of the sources is rather the contrary. I browsed through them, and most of them are directory listings, private homepages or minor websites, user-generated content, or interviews that mention the demo album only in passing. For mentioning it in the band article, it's fine, but I don't see that the demo album as such is an encyclopedic topic. --B. Wolterding (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have incorporated the Demo 2002 (Orcustus album) into the main Orcustus article, as it seems you have made up your minds about deleting the album article (which I still disagree on, but I'm not going to spend any more of my time finding references to no avail). Bulgakoff (talk) 09:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per Michig's reasoning. LuciferMorgan (talk) 20:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.