Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Della Mullady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Della Mullady[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks all notability. She is named (without any further information) in very few sources, and has recieved no significant attention at all. Fram (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:19, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I added another source, "The Harold Lloyd Encyclopedia" that lists her on twelve pages. Also added a few films from the Lonesome Luke series of films. Also added an alternate spelling of her last name: Mulleady. I don't have time this morning to search for her maiden name. Netherzone (talk) 13:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is using primary sources (such as the US census). This is a violation of the very way Wikipedia is supposed to exist. Wikipedia is not a place to publish ones person primary research. It is a way to publish things that have been covered in secondary sources. Wikipedia is not supposed to be sourced to priary sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, because we do not publish original research. There's magazines and online bulletin boards for that stuff. Bearian (talk) 20:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE, WP:GNG or any other notability guidelines - searching Newspapers.com shows no results at all (even with name variants). The Harold Lloyd Encyclopedia seems to list her as a cast member of the films named, which does not match what the contemporary directories say, and doesn't help to establish notability. It's possible that someone might research and write about her in the future, but at present there is no coverage in secondary sources apart from The Harold Lloyd Encyclopedia, which is not enough by itself. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - After an in-depth search on her name and variations thereof, I cannot find anything else other than the Harold Lloyd Encyclopedia to establish notability, no news mentions from the time period, or film history articles. Maybe mention her on the film pages where she was the editor and there is a citation to back it up, if that seems relevant (?) Netherzone (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.