Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delete Agency

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agency[edit]

Delete Agency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a non-notable digital marketing company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. MER-C 16:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Seems kinda soapy to me, and all the sources are just links to their own web pages or accomplishments they've made. All sources (when searched) just are self-promotion. DudeTheNinja ( speak to me | spy on me ) 16:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Just another promotional article about a non-notable company in which its creator thinks listing a bunch of names and meaningless awards will somehow justify its existence. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 16:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The content describes a firm going about its business, supported by routine partnerships and announcement references which are insufficient for WP:NCORP. Nor are the listed industry awards inherently notable. The relation between Fuse 8 and Delete described in the history section doesn't seem to accord with this 2010 announcement coverage but, again, that coverage is insufficient for notability here, and my searches are not finding WP:CORPDEPTH coverage, either for Delete Agency or Fuse 8. AllyD (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: The fact that this agency has won some type of awards might make it notable, depending on the award notability and significance overall. If it can be shown this company is the recipient of a major business award, then keep. If not- delete. -O.R.Comms 03:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.