Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delateralization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delateralization[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 10:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We normally keep articles on sound changes, even if they happen at present to contain just a single example. Uanfala (talk) 19:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - content can easily be added to make it longer. I'm afraid that WP:NOTDICTIONARY no longer applies. Mr KEBAB (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - now it's much longer. Mr KEBAB (talk) 12:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Definitely much more than a definition. Margalob (talk) 20:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination per Mr KEBAB's improvements. -- MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 21:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.