Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Del Rendon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Del Rendon[edit]

Del Rendon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little WP:RS to establish notability. Doesn't pass GNG, nor WP:MUS. Seems like the foundation named after him does good work, but not rising to the level required. Theredproject (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 23:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 00:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure I found these reliable sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] This article (from 2004) also states that "Del Rendon and the Puerto Rican Rum Drunks have been legends of the Starkville and Mississippi touring scenes for years." But I'm not sure if this is enough to meet GNG or NMUSICIAN, partly because two of the above sources are just a student newspaper (the Reflector). Every morning (there's a halo...) 02:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 00:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep has some reliable sources coverage such as newspaper articles but am not seeing national level so its a weak keep Atlantic306 (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.