Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degen und Wiegand KARL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Krauss-Maffei Wegmann. czar 08:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Degen und Wiegand KARL[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor steam locomotive, with no claim of importance. No sign of notability, either, hence fails WP:N. All based on a single source, and a search found nothing more (apart from a few wikis, at least one of which mirrors this), so fails WP:V as well. If there were an A7 category for rail locomotives I would have requested speedy, but alas there isn't, so here we are. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into ~~Krauss-Maffei~~ Krauss-Maffei Wegmann. Provides extra content and reference ~~that the merge target badly needs. Merge target should be cleaned up from warnings after merge.~~ gidonb (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I thought of that, but the K-M company is in a different line of business altogether, and was only set up 50 years after the said locomotive was built, so this might not easily fit there. If there were an article on the original Krauss company, that's where this should IMO be merged into, but there isn't, and putting it into Georg Krauß might again be a bridge too far. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Krauss-Maffei Wegmann is the railway company in its current form. Nightfury 16:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Well spotted, I missed that. Merging there would seem like the most sensible option to me. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge As discussed. Not notable otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 22:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.