Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defying Gravity (Keith Urban album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Canley (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Defying Gravity (Keith Urban album)[edit]

~~No sources (only source is for the tour not the album) no tracklist, no artwork Caldorwards4 (talk) 04:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)~~ Withdraw since there's some sources and a track list now. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 23:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not a big country fan here, but I went to his website and it says "new album coming in March 2009". Not enough? §FreeRangeFrog 05:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It certainly is poorly written but that's not grounds for deletion. I'm not a fan of deleting articles where a discussion hasn't even started. If you find the article to be poorly written, give the author directions in the talk page. OlYeller^Talktome 06:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Is it just me, or did we used to actually try and add sources to articles with no sources rather than hitting the delete button? No need to delete, a basic Google search will yield enough verifiable information for a decent stub. The article has a confirmed title and scheduled release date so it's not a WP:CRYSTAL issue. --Canley (talk) 10:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Release is close enough not to trouble WP:CRYSTAL and it needs to be properly expanded not deleted. Alberon (talk) 10:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why is <1 month "close enough" to dodge WP:CRYSTAL if we don't even know the track listing yet? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no track listing, no cover, hardly info on album other than the tour. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 00:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:NALBUMS requires that "Articles and information about albums with confirmed release dates in the near future must be confirmed by reliable sources and should use the {{future-album}} tag." These conditions have been met. The record company has confirmed the release on 31 March 2009.[1] WWGB (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there's several sources, but the article is in need of some cleanup IMHO CloversMallRat (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I changed my mind. It's better now. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.