Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defending America for Knowledge and Action (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Defending America for Knowledge and Action[edit]

Defending America for Knowledge and Action (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP magnet of non-notable local organization, all sources are pretty much localized and not significant per "WP:GNG" Prevan (talk) 21:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, but change tense It looks like this organization is defunct. Their web site has a date of 2009, and their last call to action ("Write President Bush...") is from 2003. News hits are from years 2003 to 2009; not finding anything since then. But they did, at one time, get news coverage. I suggest modifying the article to indicate that the organization is no longer active, although the web site lives on. John Nagle (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete insufficient coverage beyond a few relatively fringe or partisan news sites. Fails the second criterion of WP:CLUB. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: If it hasn't received significant coverage from reliable sources beyond the San Francisco area, then it doesn't meet CLUB. Ravenswing 03:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- non-notable defunct organisation. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a former, regional college student group. It's unlikely that this article could be improved beyond what should be a tiny stub. Bearian (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.