Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defence Authority Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Defence Authority Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed College[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find coverage about this school. Fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: unless nominator is able to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media. This is a weak nomination and should be opposed on the basis of WP:BEFORE, and the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability unless the above can be demonstrated Jack4576 (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:VAGUEWAVE. BookishReader (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if you !vote keep in an unreferenced article, I expect you've found sources to support a keep outcome and can list them. LibStar (talk) 03:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As per the outcome of RfC on secondary school notability the onus is on the nominator to provide assurances that they have conducted in concentrated in print and/or local media. In the absence of that a Keep is appropriate Jack4576 (talk) 08:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•Delete- No reliable sources can be found PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unreferenced and no coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 23:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only found trivial mentions of the subject in the news. Unless supporters of keep can provide can give sufficient sources, delete seems to be the reasonable action (I mean, that's kinda how AfD is supposed to work. "Unsourced material may be challenged and removed" actually means something). Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree that was the outcome of how AfD is supposed to work following RfC on secondary school notability.

SIGCOV is not a requirement for an entry. Its satisfaction merely gives rise to a presumption of notability. Jack4576 (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Insufficient coverage. LibStar (talk) 00:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no SIGCOV; Jack4576, you really need to stop with your non-policy based opposes. Most subcontinental newspapers, even ones in regional languages, are on the internet and you don't really need to conduct print searches through each newspaper. Most schools here are random private, for-profit schools with no notability or coverage. AryKun (talk) 04:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.