Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defastenism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:43, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Defastenism[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self promotion of an unknown art project supported primarily by blog entries. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC) P.S. Also amongst limited sources are a few dead links, primary sources, and passing mentions. Think this may have created a little buzz in a corner of the Dublin art world at the time, but 15 years on is largely forgettable. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable "art movement" and manifesto. Perhaps this belongs in an alumni newsletter rather than an encyclopedia. Does not pass WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Strikes me as half way between a hoax and neologism. There are a couple articles at most; not enough SIGCOV for this 'movement'. It is time to defasten this article from our servers. 02:10, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.