Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepti Jal Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Favonian (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deepti Jal Singh[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress, model. A before search gives me nothing to establish notability. A TV show and a Commercial for Nescafé does not warrant a standalone article on Wikipedia FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 15:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 15:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 15:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The sourcing in the article does not establish notability. The biggest writeup is an interview, and the others are passing mentions, directory listings or she is not mentioned at all. -- Whpq (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I could see this article coming back, if this actress were to become more notable in the future, but this article in its current form isn't there. Ryan shell (talk) 17:10, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep _ I am appalled by the decision that Deepti Jal Singh’s article is even considered for deletion. Wikipedia would not have accepted this article if it did not have significant evidence to prove it’s authenticity as well as notability. Deepti Jal Singh has her own knowledge panel on google and several articles written on and about her. How and why this article page is even considered for deletion makes me wonder if it’s really about notability, well because she meets it, or something else. There are many new comer actresses and actors on Wikipedia that has less information and is not up for deletion and I am happy to name them all. This feels like an attack on this actress doubting her notability is just disrespectful. If you are talking about criteria, you should be aware that Wikipedia would not even create the article if it did not meet the requirements needed for article notability and creation. She has been the only Indian female to be on the South African most hottest actresses on Briefly’s article as well as top 10 Kamala Khan Casting choices for marvel. She was the first Indian face for Nescafè - South Africa for international coffee day. She was on a show that won a Golden screen award. What more notability do you want? I advise that you do intensive research about an individual before making assumptions. The decisions you make have consequences. Before creating the article all boxes were checked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VogueIn (talk • contribs) 05:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)— Note to closing admin: VogueIn (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD most of the users edits are on the subject in question. On Commons the user has uploaded only files of the subject, looks like a WP:SPA & WP:COI. FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 13:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC) .[reply]
Delete Couldn't find enough significant coverage from reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. GPL93 (talk) 23:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.