Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Kashyap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 08:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Kashyap[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is unclear. I don't know of any SNG that is met, and the references don't suggest that WP:GNG is met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are articles about this person, including: http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-lovers-or-criminals-gay-couple-deepak-kashyap-and-jerry-johnson-on-supreme-court-verdict-1933582 interviewed in a movie: https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/others/sunday-read//articleshow/16136055.cms Interviewed here: http://fiftyshadesofgay.co.in/fsog-exclusive-a-fireside-chat-with-psychologist-deepak-kashyap/ He's frequently interviewed as an expert on sexuality. E.g. https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/others/sunday-read/articleshow/25906060.cms I think that this adds up to significance. Ross-c (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - GretLomborg (talk) 07:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further consideration of the sources found by Ross-c is needed. Please note that this is not a vote and comments that do not advance the discussion or address opposing arguments, such as "per nom", will carry little weight in the close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete HINDWIKI • CHAT 00:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--No continuing covg./Such interviews in supplements etc. are common due to the media attention on LGBT issues etc.Nothing significant.Winged Blades^Godric 17:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Among the sources provided only DNA.india.com counts towards notability, others consists of coverage due to presence in a film(2), an unrelated article on LGBT(last),and an interveiw(3), no other coverage is found on Google- — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 11:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing to indicate the individual passes notability. MT Train^Discuss 15:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.