Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Heat (heat rub)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mentholatum. Restoring the redirect seems to be an agreed upon way to handle this. If someone wants to expand it into a stand-alone article, they can still do it. So Why 13:59, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Heat (heat rub)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, little coverage online, this article seems promotional more than anything. NikolaiHo^☎️ 20:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one product of a company. Not notable in itself.PRehse (talk) 21:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A perfectly reasonable redirect by @Gaijin42: was rejected by an IP account for no reason, valid or otherwise. Delete or redirect Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Our house generally has a tub of Deep Heat lying around in either the bedroom or the bathroom; unfortunately this is one of those cases where a well-known and recognisable product doesn't come up in sources so much. The mentions in this search do suggest it's a household name, though. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Restore previous redirect. It's not a terribly useful redirect because it's unlikely somebody would type this awkward phrase into a search box. It seems to exist mostly to service the Deep Heat WP:DAB page. Redirects are WP:CHEAP, so I can't get too worked up over a pointless redirect, but deleting it outright wouldn't be a terrible result. If it does get deleted, fix up the DAB page to point to the right place. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jax 0677 (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a directory. Nothing indicates that this product is notable. No authoritative references are provided.--Rpclod (talk) 01:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist¹ 1 ¹ 21:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.