Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deena Duos (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Akhilleus (talk) 21:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deena Duos[edit]

Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 21:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's some big...uh, delete per WP:PORNBIO, although one could make a case for a prolific nature in the big boob subgenre.--Ispy1981 01:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:05, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, leaning toward delete after re-reading WP:PORNBIO and reviewing the previous AfD. Mostly I am curious as to whether the magazines Bust Out!, Gem, Juggs, Score, and Big Boob Busen are notable. I kind of doubt that they are; if that's the case, then she isn't notable, but this is really not subject matter that I can claim to know anything about. I'm not sure that she could get by on the "prolific within a subgenre" claim; we've seen other porn stars of the same "subgenre" on here who had absurdly huge resumes, whereas this person seems to be more or less confined to the five publications that I mentioned above. Heather 14:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable.--cj | talk 06:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.