Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeksha Center for Learning PU College (DCFL)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deeksha Center for Learning PU College (DCFL)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns with this article. Article also reads like an advert in its current form. Mistbreeze (talk) 07:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, just another pre-university/junior college (11th and 12th standards). Somebody might invoke WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, this college doesnt fit the "almost all of them are de facto notable" criteria. I added the name of this college to List of institutions of higher education in Bangalore, with one government source. —usernamekiran(talk) 08:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete basically a non-notable private coaching centre for entrance exams. Lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources, fails WP:GNG, fails WP:CORP. --Bejnar (talk) 02:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss whether a redirect to List of institutions of higher education in Bangalore could be a possible alternative to deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See previous relist comment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:03, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the list per SoWhy. We typically redirect non-notable educational institutions unless there is a reason not to. I don't see a reason not to here. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.