The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This orphan page is undisguised marketing copy serving as advertisement. Coren 03:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not a complex decision, that's for sure. Deletedoktorb | words 08:09, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Marketing. Tyrenius 01:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advert. Completely incomprehensible. Stifle (talk) 13:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as marketing. On a side note, Ow. My brain hurts after reading that. Colonel Tom 23:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
