Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decimus: The Abbey Road Sessions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Audiomachine. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 00:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decimus: The Abbey Road Sessions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the criteria WP:NALBUM. Nothing found on a web search fails Wp:GNG Domdeparis (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to write article in response to Vanquish album. Eurohunter (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm sorry I don't understand to what you were responding exactly. --Domdeparis (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to mention isn't it same situation? Eurohunter (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would say the other page is even less notable as it was released only 3 days ago. I have tagged that one for deletion as well. An album that hasn't been in the charts can be considered notable but it has to fulfill one of the criteria in WP:NALBUM Domdeparis (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added American chart. Eurohunter (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Audiomachine. Charting in and of itself does not make an album notable. Without additional sourcing where the album is discussed in more detail, a redirect will suffice. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- What make an album notable then? I think this chart is sufficient. Something under Billboard 200 should be enough. United States are a great country. Eurohunter (talk) 11:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The criteria for WP:NALBUM says that it may be notable but it also says Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography.Domdeparis (talk) 13:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:NALBUM also says to meet notability requirements, a topic must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Reaching #13 on a sub-chart, doesn't make an album automatically notable. Find the coverage. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect - Keep, or redirect to Audiomachine per WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 12:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.