Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decatising
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Decatising[edit]
- Decatising (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like a neologism. No sources. DimaG (talk) 02:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article has good sources now and see Google books for several references to this process in books on textile technology. –Syncategoremata (talk) 04:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Decatising (decatizing) a neologism? The most casual look shows plenty of sources in google books and google scholar. --Epipelagic (talk) 04:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Sourced and viable. SteveStrummer (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn. --DimaG (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.